🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.